DeGive v. Grand Rapids Furniture Co.

21 S.E. 582, 94 Ga. 605, 1894 Ga. LEXIS 208
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 30, 1894·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

L. DeGive bought of defendant in error a number of opera-house chairs. He was sued for a balance on the bill, payment of which balance he had refused to pay, •on the ground that the purchase price should be reduced by so much for inferiority of the chairs to the model by which they were bought. He omitted to defend the ■suit until after judgment had been rendered against him. He moved to set aside the same, on the ground that he was a foreigner, never naturalized, and was a ■citizen of the Kingdom of Belgium, residing in Atlanta .as the consul of the Belgian government, duly com[606] missioned and accredited by it, and recognized as such by the government of the United States, by an exequatur duly executed by the President, copy of which was attached ; wherefore, he was advised, the court rendering the judgment had no jurisdiction of him. The motion was overruled, and he excepted.

Goodwin & Westmoreland, for plaintiff in error. Bishop & Andrews, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DeGive v. Grand Rapids Furniture Co., 21 S.E. 582, 94 Ga. 605, 1894 Ga. LEXIS 208 (Ga. 1894).

21 S.E. 582 (DeGive v. Grand Rapids Furniture Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DeLeon v. Walters
50 So. 934 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1909)
Scott v. Hobe
84 N.W. 181 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1900)
Wilcox v. Luco
50 P. 758 (California Supreme Court, 1897)