Degen, Sr. (John) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)

Nevada Supreme Court

Degen, Sr. (John) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)

DecidedOctober 11, 2019

Docket79566

StatusPublished

This text of Degen, Sr. (John) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State) (Degen, Sr. (John) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Degen, Sr. (John) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State), (Neb. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JOHN ANTHONY WAYNE DEGEN, No. 79566 SR., Petitioner, vs. THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, F r IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE, OCT 1 1 Respondent, 1•::-Rt"..41?,1 f:,1;,:i•-•:11:: COURT and CLEf-

BY THE STATE OF NEVADA, DEPUTY

Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus in which petitioner seeks a writ directing the district court to order the public defender's office to withdraw from the case and send petitioner his complete case file. Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised,

SUPREME COURT we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRAP OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 444PD 1- q7,143 I1 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) CPetitioner[ ] cardies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

C.J.

Piek24. J. A6-A. A42\ ,J Pickering Hardesty

cc: John Anthony Wayne Degen, Sr. Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 2 4111111111e, .•':?•,.4 • 11E1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JOHN ANTHONY WAYNE DEGEN, No. 79566 SR., Petitioner, vs. THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, F r IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE, OCT 1 1 Respondent, 1•::-Rt"..41?,1 f:,1;,:i•-•:11:: COURT and CLEf-

BY THE STATE OF NEVADA, DEPUTY

Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus in which petitioner seeks a writ directing the district court to order the public defender's office to withdraw from the case and send petitioner his complete case file. Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised,

SUPREME COURT we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRAP OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 444PD 1- q7,143 I1 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) CPetitioner[ ] cardies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

C.J.

Piek24. J. A6-A. A42\ ,J Pickering Hardesty

cc: John Anthony Wayne Degen, Sr. Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 2 4111111111e, .•':?•,.4 • 11E1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Degen, Sr. (John) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/degen-sr-john-vs-dist-ct-state-nev-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack