DeGarmo v. Arrowhead Builders Supply

228 N.W.2d 262, 303 Minn. 567, 1975 Minn. LEXIS 1587
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedApril 4, 1975
DocketNo. 44870
StatusPublished

This text of 228 N.W.2d 262 (DeGarmo v. Arrowhead Builders Supply) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DeGarmo v. Arrowhead Builders Supply, 228 N.W.2d 262, 303 Minn. 567, 1975 Minn. LEXIS 1587 (Mich. 1975).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Relators seek review of a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission affirming the decision of the compensation judge allowing disability benefits to the employee.

The attending physician, supported by certain laboratory findings together with the history given by the employee, testified the heart attack causing the disability was work related. A qualified physician, who examined the employee on behalf of the employer, testified to the contrary.

The commission had before it credible testimony on which to base its findings. The findings are not manifestly contrary to the evidence and this court is therefore bound by the findings of the commission.

Respondent is allowed $350 attorneys fees for this appeal.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 N.W.2d 262, 303 Minn. 567, 1975 Minn. LEXIS 1587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/degarmo-v-arrowhead-builders-supply-minn-1975.