Degarbris v. Gerome
This text of 156 A. 840 (Degarbris v. Gerome) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The female plaintiff was struck by defendants’ motor car while crossing a road and was injured. The jury awarded a verdict in her favor of $200 and to her husband, per quod, $300.
The plaintiffs claim that the verdict is inadequate; the defendants, that there should have been a verdict in their favor.
Our reading of the testimony satisfies us that if the plaintiffs were entitled to any damages the amounts found are plainly inadequate; but on the other hand the right to a recovery is in our view most doubtful. Our conclusion is that there should be a new trial at large, whereat the questions both of liability and quantum of damages may be retried.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
156 A. 840, 9 N.J. Misc. 1135, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/degarbris-v-gerome-nj-1931.