Degand v. Barnes-Jewish Hospital

Missouri Court of Appeals

Degand v. Barnes-Jewish Hospital

446 S.W.3d 260, 2014 WL 3582845

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 22, 2014·No. No. ED 101050·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Linda Degand (“Plaintiff’) appeals from the trial court’s January 23, 2014 order, after a jury trial, granting the motion for satisfaction of judgment filed by Barnes-Jewish Hospital (“Defendant”) and denying Plaintiffs request for post-judgment interest, and the trial court’s February 6, 2014 order awarding Defendant attorneys’ fees. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Linda Degand (“Plaintiff’) appeals from the trial court’s January 23, 2014 order, after a jury trial, granting the motion for satisfaction of judgment filed by Barnes-Jewish Hospital (“Defendant”) and denying Plaintiffs request for post-judgment interest, and the trial court’s February 6, 2014 order awarding Defendant attorneys’ fees. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Degand v. Barnes-Jewish Hospital, 446 S.W.3d 260, 2014 WL 3582845 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

446 S.W.3d 260 (Degand v. Barnes-Jewish Hospital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.