Defreitas v. Defreitas

398 So. 2d 991
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 20, 1981
Docket80-870
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 398 So. 2d 991 (Defreitas v. Defreitas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Defreitas v. Defreitas, 398 So. 2d 991 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

398 So.2d 991 (1981)

Marie DEFREITAS, Appellant,
v.
William DEFREITAS, Appellee.

No. 80-870.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 20, 1981.

*992 Kenneth Ofgang of Law Offices of Lieberman & Burke, Miami, for appellant.

James A. Weck of Weck & Weck, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order of modification of child support in a domestic matter. The former wife asserts that the husband's petition for modification was an insufficient pleading upon which to change the amount of child support. We agree and reverse. Florida law clearly holds that a trial court lacks jurisdiction to hear and determine matters which are not the subject of appropriate pleadings and notice. Barreiro v. Barreiro, 377 So.2d 999 (Fla.3d DCA 1979); and Purvis v. Carver, 303 So.2d 681 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974). Here, the husband filed a petition for modification wherein he sought to have custody of the children transferred to him. The request for change of custody was denied, but the amount of child support was substantially altered.

We conclude that the order below must be reversed, but we note the continuing jurisdiction of the trial court in this matter and remand for further proceedings without prejudice to consideration of all issues of child support upon the filing of appropriate pleadings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

MOORE, BERANEK, and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tina Sieberg-Shabbick v. Michael Shabbick
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024
Garcia v. Stewart
906 So. 2d 1117 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Byers v. Callahan
848 So. 2d 1180 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Rauch v. Rauch
711 So. 2d 582 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Todaro v. Todaro
704 So. 2d 138 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Smith v. Smith
655 So. 2d 1267 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Bixler v. Nielsen
521 N.W.2d 475 (Court of Appeals of Iowa, 1994)
Hall v. Hall
549 So. 2d 207 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Oakley v. Oakley
439 So. 2d 1044 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
In Re Estate of Hatcher
439 So. 2d 977 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
398 So. 2d 991, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/defreitas-v-defreitas-fladistctapp-1981.