Defrank v. State
886 So. 2d 253, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15414, 2004 WL 2347877
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 20, 2004·No. No. 4D03-4510·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We remand this appeal of a revocation of probation for a written order setting forth the reasons for revoking probation. Black v. Romano, 471 U.S. 606, 612, 105 [254]*254S.Ct. 2254, 85 L.Ed.2d 636 (1985) (due process requires “a written statement by the factfinder as to the evidence relied on and the reasons for revoking probation.”); Watts v. State, 688 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Defrank v. State, 886 So. 2d 253, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15414, 2004 WL 2347877 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
886 So. 2d 253 (Defrank v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
BRIAN HARRINGTON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
238 So. 3d 294 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Mosley v. State
913 So. 2d 1217 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)