Defrank v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Defrank v. State

886 So. 2d 253, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15414, 2004 WL 2347877

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 20, 2004

DocketNo. 4D03-4510

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 886 So. 2d 253 (Defrank v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Defrank v. State, 886 So. 2d 253, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15414, 2004 WL 2347877 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We remand this appeal of a revocation of probation for a written order setting forth the reasons for revoking probation. Black v. Romano, 471 U.S. 606, 612, 105 [254]*254S.Ct. 2254, 85 L.Ed.2d 636 (1985) (due process requires “a written statement by the factfinder as to the evidence relied on and the reasons for revoking probation.”); Watts v. State, 688 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

FARMER, C.J., KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We remand this appeal of a revocation of probation for a written order setting forth the reasons for revoking probation. Black v. Romano, 471 U.S. 606, 612, 105 [254]*254S.Ct. 2254, 85 L.Ed.2d 636 (1985) (due process requires “a written statement by the factfinder as to the evidence relied on and the reasons for revoking probation.”); Watts v. State, 688 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

FARMER, C.J., KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

886 So. 2d 253, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15414, 2004 WL 2347877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/defrank-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack