DeForest v. State

316 So. 2d 302, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14225
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in DeForest v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15521
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 31, 1975·No. No. 75-189·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The evidence shows that prima facie proof of the corpus delicti was established, Williams v. State, 117 So.2d 548 (2d DCA [303]*303Fla.1960). The confession here was not tainted by the initial interrogation, made prior to any Miranda warnings, State v. Outten, 206 So.2d 392 (Fla.1968).

Affirmed.

WALDEN, C. J., and CROSS and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DeForest v. State, 316 So. 2d 302, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14225 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

316 So. 2d 302 (DeForest v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Outten
206 So. 2d 392 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1968)
Williams v. State
117 So. 2d 548 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)