Deford v. Hutchison

45 Kan. 332
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Deford v. Hutchison. Read the opinion of the Court — 45 Kan. 318
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided January 15, 1891·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Upon a reexamination of the former opinion handed down, we think it necessary to correct the same so far as to eliminate therefrom all reference to any counterclaim or set-off. In the action the defendant successfully maintained the sale of the goods from her to Deford, with the right upon her part to retain the same until her interest therein was paid. She was therefore entitled to recover a judgment against the plaintiff in the alternative for a return of the property to her, or the value of her interest therein. The original opinion will be corrected accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deford v. Hutchison, 45 Kan. 332 (kan 1891).

45 Kan. 332 (Deford v. Hutchison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.