DeFoor v. Donaldson

135 S.E. 405, 163 Ga. 36, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 15
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 14, 1926
DocketNo. 5387
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 135 S.E. 405 (DeFoor v. Donaldson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DeFoor v. Donaldson, 135 S.E. 405, 163 Ga. 36, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 15 (Ga. 1926).

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

The exception in this case is to a judgment refusing to grant a temporary injunction. Petitioners, alleging themselves to be owners of adjoining lands in Eulton County, sought to enjoin the opening of a new cemetery. One of the grounds upon which the injunction was sought was that the defendants had not obtained a permit from the proper authorities of Eulton County, as required under the act of the General Assembly approved August 9, 1910 (Ga. Laws 1910, p. 130). Other grounds were insisted upon by the petitioners, but they need not be stated. The defendants admitted that they had not obtained the permission aforesaid, but insisted that they were not opening a new cemetery but were merely extending the cemetery in use for many years by Sardis Church. Also, that defendants were merely selling lots to third" parties who might use them for cemetery purposes, and that defendants themselves did not intend to so use the lots. Held:

(а) Under the decision in the case of Southview Cemetery Association v. Kitchens, 162 Ga. 322 (133 S. E. 919), the court erred in refusing to enjoin the defendants.

(б) The answer of the defendants contains the following admissions: “The persons to whom they will sell will probably devote this ground to burial or cemetery, purposes. It is the only use to which this property could be put. It would not be suitable for any. other purpose.” [37]*37It thus appears that defendants are undertaking to sell lots to be used for cemetery purposes.

No. 5387. October 14, 1926. McElreath & Scott, for plaintiffs. Key, McClelland & McClelland, for defendants.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arlington Cemetery Corp. v. Bindig
95 S.E.2d 378 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 S.E. 405, 163 Ga. 36, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/defoor-v-donaldson-ga-1926.