Defontes v. State
889 So. 2d 217, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19674, 2004 WL 2952777
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 22, 2004·No. No. 4D04-1933·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s adjudications and sentences without prejudice to file a rule 3.850 motion. Because the trial court failed to enter a written order of revocation of probation specifying the conditions appellant violated, we remand to the trial court to reduce its findings of the revocation of probation to writing. See Riley v. State, 884 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Campbell v. State, 776 So.2d 1036 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Defontes v. State, 889 So. 2d 217, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19674, 2004 WL 2952777 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
889 So. 2d 217 (Defontes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
King v. State
46 So. 3d 1171 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Delisa v. State
910 So. 2d 418 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)