Deffur v. Tansey

147 A. 908, 106 N.J.L. 236, 1930 N.J. LEXIS 175
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Deffur v. Tansey. Read the opinion of the Court — 5 N.J. Misc. 1040
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 3, 1930·Published

Opinion

Pee Cueiam. •

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Paekee, Kalisch, Campbell, Case, Bodine, Van Buskiek, McG-lennon, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 11.

For reversal — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deffur v. Tansey, 147 A. 908, 106 N.J.L. 236, 1930 N.J. LEXIS 175 (N.J. 1930).

147 A. 908 (Deffur v. Tansey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.