Defendorf v. McGowan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Defendorf v. McGowan

280 A.D.2d 957, 720 N.Y.S.2d 871, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3473

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 7, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 280 A.D.2d 957 (Defendorf v. McGowan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Defendorf v. McGowan, 280 A.D.2d 957, 720 N.Y.S.2d 871, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3473 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and amended petition dismissed. Memorandum: The determination discontinuing petitioner’s public assistance and food stamp benefits, based on petitioner’s failure to comply with job search requirements without good cause, is supported by substantial evidence and conforms to all statutory and regulatory mandates (see, Social Services Law § 336-d; 12 NYCRR 1300.12; see generally, Matter of Cruz v Wing, 276 AD2d 307; Matter of Castro v Wing, 270 AD2d 257, 258; Matter of Rosencrants v Wing, 269 AD2d 682, 682-683). (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Oswego County, Nicholson, J.) Present— Pine, J. P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and amended petition dismissed. Memorandum: The determination discontinuing petitioner’s public assistance and food stamp benefits, based on petitioner’s failure to comply with job search requirements without good cause, is supported by substantial evidence and conforms to all statutory and regulatory mandates (see, Social Services Law § 336-d; 12 NYCRR 1300.12; see generally, Matter of Cruz v Wing, 276 AD2d 307; Matter of Castro v Wing, 270 AD2d 257, 258; Matter of Rosencrants v Wing, 269 AD2d 682, 682-683). (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Oswego County, Nicholson, J.) Present— Pine, J. P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 A.D.2d 957, 720 N.Y.S.2d 871, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/defendorf-v-mcgowan-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack