Defenders of Wildlife v. Norton
Opinion
JUDGMENT
Upon consideration of the district court’s order entered March 31, 2003, denying plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and granting defendants’ cross-motion for summary judgment; the district court’s order entered June 4, 2003, denying plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration; and the expiration of the time for filing a notice of appeal on August 4, 2003, see Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), without any such notice being filed, it is hereby
ORDERED that this appeal from the order of the district court denying appel[64] lants leave to intervene as of right be dismissed as moot.
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
74 F. App'x 63 (Defenders of Wildlife v. Norton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.