Defenders of Wildlife Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
This text of 450 F.3d 394 (Defenders of Wildlife Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Environmental Protection Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER
The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The request for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc is DENIED. Judge Kozinski’s and Judge Kleinfeld’s dissents from denial of en banc rehearing, and Judge Berzon’s concurrence in denial of en banc rehearing, are filed concurrently herewith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
450 F.3d 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/defenders-of-wildlife-center-for-biological-diversity-v-united-states-ca9-2006.