Defelice v. Board of Education

37 A.D.2d 930, 326 N.Y.S.2d 89, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3062
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 4, 1971·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on January 7, 1971, in so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, and the application denied. The application is to allow the service of a notice of claim after the expiration of the statutory period in an action for personal injuries by an infant and in his father’s derivative action for loss of services. Special [931]*931Term granted the application. Defendant’s appeal is limited to the father's action. Aside from infancy, the only grounds for allowing a late filing are mental or physical incapacity (General Municipal Law, § 50-e, subd. 5). Inability to speak English is not physical incapacity (Matter of Gugliotto v. City of New York, 10 A D 2d 986, affd. 9 N Y 2d 738). Nor does the exception of infancy in the infant’s action accrue to the benefit of the father in 2d 943; Matter of McAllister v. New York City Housing Auth., 21 A D 2d the derivative action (Jefferson v. New York City Housing Auth., 24 A D 660). There is no general discretion vested in .the court aside from the statutory exceptions whether or not prejudice is shown. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Capozzoli, McGivern, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defelice v. Board of Education, 37 A.D.2d 930, 326 N.Y.S.2d 89, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3062 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

37 A.D.2d 930 (Defelice v. Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Manfredonio v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.
116 Misc. 2d 652 (New York Supreme Court, 1982)
Charalambakis v. City of New York
54 A.D.2d 553 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)