De'Ette Nesbitt, Independent of the Estate of Ernest v. Nesbitt v. Donald F. Keeney, Mary A. Keeney, and Michael D. Keeney

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 25, 2007
Docket13-06-00169-CV
StatusPublished

This text of De'Ette Nesbitt, Independent of the Estate of Ernest v. Nesbitt v. Donald F. Keeney, Mary A. Keeney, and Michael D. Keeney (De'Ette Nesbitt, Independent of the Estate of Ernest v. Nesbitt v. Donald F. Keeney, Mary A. Keeney, and Michael D. Keeney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
De'Ette Nesbitt, Independent of the Estate of Ernest v. Nesbitt v. Donald F. Keeney, Mary A. Keeney, and Michael D. Keeney, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-06-169-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

__________________________________________



DE'ETTE NESBITT, INDEPENDENT

EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF

ERNEST V. NESBITT, Appellant,



v.


DONALD F. KEENEY, MARY A. KEENEY, AND

MICHAEL D. KEENEY, Appellees.


On appeal from the 377th District Court of Victoria County, Texas.



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Judges Yañez and Vela
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, De'Ette Nesbitt, Independent Executrix of the Estate of Ernest V. Nesbitt, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 377th District Court of Victoria County, Texas, in cause number 02-11-58,874-D. After the record and briefs were filed, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss with prejudice. In the motion, the parties state that appellant no longer desires to prosecute its claims against appellees. The parties request that the appeal be dismissed with prejudice and that all costs be taxed against the party incurring same.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to dismiss the appeal with prejudice, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The joint motion to dismiss with prejudice is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM



Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 25th day of January, 2007.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
De'Ette Nesbitt, Independent of the Estate of Ernest v. Nesbitt v. Donald F. Keeney, Mary A. Keeney, and Michael D. Keeney, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deette-nesbitt-independent-of-the-estate-of-ernest-texapp-2007.