Deese v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Deese v. State

184 So. 924, 134 Fla. 837, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1197

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 9, 1938·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Writ of error brings for review judgment of conviction of the offense of larceny of two steers.

We have carefully considered all contentions presented by the plaintiff in error in brief and in oral argument and, in connection therewith, have considered the entire record with the result that we find no reversible error disclosed thereby.

Therefore, the judgment should be, and is, affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Writ of error brings for review judgment of conviction of the offense of larceny of two steers.

We have carefully considered all contentions presented by the plaintiff in error in brief and in oral argument and, in connection therewith, have considered the entire record with the result that we find no reversible error disclosed thereby.

Therefore, the judgment should be, and is, affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur.

Deese v. State, 184 So. 924, 134 Fla. 837, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1197 (Fla. 1938).

Pincite

184 So. 924 (Deese v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.