Dees v. State

691 So. 2d 42, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3154, 1997 WL 154772
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 4, 1997
DocketNo. 96-2350
StatusPublished

This text of 691 So. 2d 42 (Dees v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dees v. State, 691 So. 2d 42, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3154, 1997 WL 154772 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

LAWRENCE, Judge.

Sidney Harris Dees, III (Dees) was adjudged guilty and sentenced, after his conviction by a jury of robbery with a deadly weapon. The Public Defender filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Dees waived his right to file a pro se brief. We have reviewed the record and agree with the Public Defender that no good faith argument can be made that error occurred in the trial court.

We accordingly affirm Dees’ judgment and sentence. We note however a scrivener’s error in the judgment and sentence in that the statutory citation is shown as section 893.13, Florida Statutes, when the correct citation is section 812.13. We therefore remand solely for the purpose of correcting the scrivener’s error.

AFFIRMED.

WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
691 So. 2d 42, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3154, 1997 WL 154772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dees-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.