Dees v. Logan

665 S.E.2d 736, 292 Ga. App. 719, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 2580, 2008 Ga. App. LEXIS 849
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dees v. Logan. Read the opinion of the Court — 281 Ga. App. 837
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 15, 2008·No. A06A0929·Published

Opinion

Miller, Judge.

In Dees v. Logan, 282 Ga. 815 (653 SE2d 735) (2007), the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed Division 2 of this Court’s opinion in Dees v. Logan, 281 Ga. App. 837 (637 SE2d 424) (2006). Therefore, we vacate Division 2 of our earlier opinion and adopt the opinion of the Supreme Court as our own in its place. Given the foregoing, we also vacate that portion of Division 4 of such opinion which awarded the Dees zero dollars for past lost wages in lieu of the jury’s award for past lost wages calculated pro rata. Our disposition of Division 3 of said opinion is moot.

Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.

Johnson, P. J., and Ellington, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dees v. Logan, 665 S.E.2d 736, 292 Ga. App. 719, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 2580, 2008 Ga. App. LEXIS 849 (Ga. Ct. App. 2008).

665 S.E.2d 736 (Dees v. Logan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dees v. Logan
637 S.E.2d 424 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2006)
Dees v. Logan
653 S.E.2d 735 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2007)