Dees v. Cheuvronts

Appellate Court of Illinois

Dees v. Cheuvronts

147 Ill. App. 55, 1909 Ill. App. LEXIS 11

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedMarch 4, 1909

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 147 Ill. App. 55 (Dees v. Cheuvronts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dees v. Cheuvronts, 147 Ill. App. 55, 1909 Ill. App. LEXIS 11 (Ill. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Peb Curiam.

This hill was by appellees against appellants for a perpetual injunction in restraint of the use of certain real estate and to adjudge and decree the right and title thereto as between contesting claimants. It is alleged in the bill and decreed by the court, that certain of the appellees are the owners in fee simple of the premises in controversy and their right, if any, to the relief prayed for, is based upon that proposition. It is contended on the other hand that the school trustees, the appellants, are the owners in fee by virtue of certain deeds of conveyance, which are made exhibits to the bill. A freehold is therefore involved and this court has no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Sanford v. Kane, 127 Ill. 591; Wessels v. Colebank, 174 Ill. 618; Snyder et al. v. Baker et al., 125 Ill. App. 482; Pratt et al. v. Kendig et al., 30 Ill. App. 281. The appeal will be dismissed and the clerk of this court is hereby directed to transmit to the clerk of the Supreme Court the transcript, files and a copy of this order, as required by Section 102, Practice Act.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peb Curiam.

This hill was by appellees against appellants for a perpetual injunction in restraint of the use of certain real estate and to adjudge and decree the right and title thereto as between contesting claimants. It is alleged in the bill and decreed by the court, that certain of the appellees are the owners in fee simple of the premises in controversy and their right, if any, to the relief prayed for, is based upon that proposition. It is contended on the other hand that the school trustees, the appellants, are the owners in fee by virtue of certain deeds of conveyance, which are made exhibits to the bill. A freehold is therefore involved and this court has no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Sanford v. Kane, 127 Ill. 591; Wessels v. Colebank, 174 Ill. 618; Snyder et al. v. Baker et al., 125 Ill. App. 482; Pratt et al. v. Kendig et al., 30 Ill. App. 281. The appeal will be dismissed and the clerk of this court is hereby directed to transmit to the clerk of the Supreme Court the transcript, files and a copy of this order, as required by Section 102, Practice Act.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 Ill. App. 55, 1909 Ill. App. LEXIS 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dees-v-cheuvronts-illappct-1909.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack