Dees v. . Ballard
188 S.E. 630, 210 N.C. 841, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 261
Opinion
It was alleged that Ballard was in the employ of the defendant Everett at the time of the collision, transporting “hands” to his threshing machine. The evidence fails to support this allegation. There was no error in dismissing the action as to the defendant Everett.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dees v. . Ballard, 188 S.E. 630, 210 N.C. 841, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 261 (N.C. 1936).
188 S.E. 630 (Dees v. . Ballard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.