Deerman v. State

370 So. 2d 1107, 1979 Ala. LEXIS 2885
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMay 11, 1979
Docket78-428
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 370 So. 2d 1107 (Deerman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Deerman v. State, 370 So. 2d 1107, 1979 Ala. LEXIS 2885 (Ala. 1979).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals, 370 So.2d 1107, is wholly insufficient in that no grounds for issuance of the writ contained in Rule 39, ARAP, are properly alleged, nor is Rule 39(k), ARAP, utilized in the absence of an opinion by the Court of Criminal Appeals.

Accordingly, the petition is due to be, and is hereby, stricken.

PETITION STRICKEN.

TORBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, FAULKNER, ALMON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Save Our Streams, Inc.
541 So. 2d 549 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
370 So. 2d 1107, 1979 Ala. LEXIS 2885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deerman-v-state-ala-1979.