Deering v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Deering v. State

180 S.E.2d 245, 123 Ga. App. 223, 1971 Ga. App. LEXIS 1171

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 27, 1971

Docket45814

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 180 S.E.2d 245 (Deering v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Deering v. State, 180 S.E.2d 245, 123 Ga. App. 223, 1971 Ga. App. LEXIS 1171 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Evans, Judge.

The defendant was indicted, tried and convicted of selling beer without a license. He was sentenced to serve 12 months in the penitentiary, the sentence to be suspended and served on probation upon the payment of a fine. Thereafter motion for new trial was filed and amended, and overruled. The appeal is from the overruling of the motion for new trial. Held:

1. The evidence shows the defendant had sought to obtain a beer license, without success, and thereafter sold beer without a valid license. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict of guilty.

2. The court did not err, as contended, in instructing the jury that the defendant "committed this offense.” A reading of the entire charge discloses that the court instructed the jury that, the defendant was charged in a presentment as "alleging that he, on June 20, 1969, committed this offense.” Thus there is no merit in the enumeration of error complaining of the denial of the motion for new trial based on this special ground.

3. The trial court did not err in charging the jury that while the law requires the State to prove the defendant’s guilt of the offense to their satisfaction beyond a reasonable doubt, yet the law does not require the State to prove the defendant’s guilt to a mathematical or absolute certainty, and in thereafter proceeding to charge that a resonable doubt is not a vague or conjectural doubt, or a fanciful doubt, or an imaginary doubt, or a possibility that the defendant may be innocent, but' that it is a doubt founded upon reason. Fletcher v. State, 90 Ga. 468 (2) (17 SE 100); Bonner v. State, 152 Ga. 214 (1) (109 SE 291). There is no merit in the contention that the court erred in failing to grant the motion for new trial based on this allegedly erroneous charge.

Judgment affirmed.

Jordan, P. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Evans, Judge.

The defendant was indicted, tried and convicted of selling beer without a license. He was sentenced to serve 12 months in the penitentiary, the sentence to be suspended and served on probation upon the payment of a fine. Thereafter motion for new trial was filed and amended, and overruled. The appeal is from the overruling of the motion for new trial. Held:

1. The evidence shows the defendant had sought to obtain a beer license, without success, and thereafter sold beer without a valid license. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict of guilty.

2. The court did not err, as contended, in instructing the jury that the defendant "committed this offense.” A reading of the entire charge discloses that the court instructed the jury that, the defendant was charged in a presentment as "alleging that he, on June 20, 1969, committed this offense.” Thus there is no merit in the enumeration of error complaining of the denial of the motion for new trial based on this special ground.

3. The trial court did not err in charging the jury that while the law requires the State to prove the defendant’s guilt of the offense to their satisfaction beyond a reasonable doubt, yet the law does not require the State to prove the defendant’s guilt to a mathematical or absolute certainty, and in thereafter proceeding to charge that a resonable doubt is not a vague or conjectural doubt, or a fanciful doubt, or an imaginary doubt, or a possibility that the defendant may be innocent, but' that it is a doubt founded upon reason. Fletcher v. State, 90 Ga. 468 (2) (17 SE 100); Bonner v. State, 152 Ga. 214 (1) (109 SE 291). There is no merit in the contention that the court erred in failing to grant the motion for new trial based on this allegedly erroneous charge.

Judgment affirmed.

Jordan, P. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 S.E.2d 245, 123 Ga. App. 223, 1971 Ga. App. LEXIS 1171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deering-v-state-gactapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack