Deering v. Starr

22 Jones & S. 554
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedDecember 30, 1886
StatusPublished

This text of 22 Jones & S. 554 (Deering v. Starr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Deering v. Starr, 22 Jones & S. 554 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1886).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

“Judgment- and order affirmed, with costs! An irregularity in the form of the judgment should be corrected. The judgment is as if a verdict had been directed. In fact, upon the trial the complaint was dismissed.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 Jones & S. 554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deering-v-starr-nysuperctnyc-1886.