Deering v. Society for Savings
This text of 33 Ohio C.C. Dec. 644 (Deering v. Society for Savings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Cuyahoga Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff in her petition claimed the fund involved in this case as a gift.
Such being the case, it was incumbent upon her to prove all the essential elements of a gift.
[645]*645She proved a delivery of the fund, which was reduced to her possession before the donor’s death. She failed to prove an intention to make a gift. The mere possession of the funds by the donee raises no presumption that the possession was acquired as a gift. Thornton, Gifts, par. 321.
When no consideration exists for the transfer of property, in the absence of explanatory circumstances, a resulting trust arises in favor of the grantor or transferor. Roberts v. Remy, 56 Ohio St. 249 [46 N. E. 1066].
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 Ohio C.C. Dec. 644, 22 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 406, 1907 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deering-v-society-for-savings-ohcirctcuyahoga-1907.