Deering v. Schreyer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Deering v. Schreyer

120 A.D. 872, 105 N.Y.S. 1112

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1907

StatusPublished

This text of 120 A.D. 872 (Deering v. Schreyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Deering v. Schreyer, 120 A.D. 872, 105 N.Y.S. 1112 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The judgment should be modified by striking out the extra allowance to each defendant, and by striking out the taxable costs (but not the taxable disbursements) allowed to the defendant Fields,, and-as. so modified affirmed, without costs to either party on this appeal; the figures as to the modification to be determined upon the settlement of the order. Present—Patterson, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Houghton and Lambert, Jj. Judgment" modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without-'costs. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The judgment should be modified by striking out the extra allowance to each defendant, and by striking out the taxable costs (but not the taxable disbursements) allowed to the defendant Fields,, and-as. so modified affirmed, without costs to either party on this appeal; the figures as to the modification to be determined upon the settlement of the order. Present—Patterson, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Houghton and Lambert, Jj. Judgment" modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without-'costs. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 A.D. 872, 105 N.Y.S. 1112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deering-v-schreyer-nyappdiv-1907.