Deerfield v. Park Plaza Apartment

Missouri Court of Appeals

Deerfield v. Park Plaza Apartment

888 S.W.2d 408, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1908, 1994 WL 693479

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 13, 1994·No. No. 65459·Published

Opinion

[409]*409 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff filed a claim in small claims court seeking the return of her security deposit held by defendant. After judgment for defendant in small claims court, plaintiff petitioned for a trial de novo in the circuit court. Following the trial de novo, the circuit court entered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals; we affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[409]*409 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff filed a claim in small claims court seeking the return of her security deposit held by defendant. After judgment for defendant in small claims court, plaintiff petitioned for a trial de novo in the circuit court. Following the trial de novo, the circuit court entered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals; we affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b).

Deerfield v. Park Plaza Apartment, 888 S.W.2d 408, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1908, 1994 WL 693479 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

888 S.W.2d 408 (Deerfield v. Park Plaza Apartment) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.