Deerfield Realty Co. v. Hague

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Deerfield Realty Co. v. Hague

155 A. 893, 9 N.J. Misc. 857, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 208

DecidedAugust 1, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 155 A. 893 (Deerfield Realty Co. v. Hague) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Deerfield Realty Co. v. Hague, 155 A. 893, 9 N.J. Misc. 857, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 208 (N.J. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this case the Jersey City authorities denied the relator, the Deerfield Realty Company, a building permit. The company presented its application for a permit to erect a garage on Hudson Boulevard back in the summer of 1929, and the application was refused, the discussion of the commissioners indicating on the ground that it considered that enough gasoline stations had already been erected.

The case came before this court in October, 1929, on rule to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue and the court awarded an alternative writ. Reported 8 N. J. Mis. R. 637. The return to that writ is now before us. The city makes the threadbare contention that it has an ordinance pending, the object of which is to rezone this section among others.

The case falls within our decisions in Holdsworth v. Hague and Brengel v. Hague, Nos. 56 and 51, respectively, in the October term, 1930, of the Supreme Court.

A peremptory writ of mandamus is awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In this case the Jersey City authorities denied the relator, the Deerfield Realty Company, a building permit. The company presented its application for a permit to erect a garage on Hudson Boulevard back in the summer of 1929, and the application was refused, the discussion of the commissioners indicating on the ground that it considered that enough gasoline stations had already been erected.

The case came before this court in October, 1929, on rule to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue and the court awarded an alternative writ. Reported 8 N. J. Mis. R. 637. The return to that writ is now before us. The city makes the threadbare contention that it has an ordinance pending, the object of which is to rezone this section among others.

The case falls within our decisions in Holdsworth v. Hague and Brengel v. Hague, Nos. 56 and 51, respectively, in the October term, 1930, of the Supreme Court.

A peremptory writ of mandamus is awarded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 A. 893, 9 N.J. Misc. 857, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deerfield-realty-co-v-hague-nj-1931.