Deer Park Teachers Ass'n v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Deer Park Teachers Ass'n v. Board of Education

74 A.D.2d 814, 425 N.Y.S.2d 270, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10553

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 3, 1980

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 74 A.D.2d 814 (Deer Park Teachers Ass'n v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Deer Park Teachers Ass'n v. Board of Education, 74 A.D.2d 814, 425 N.Y.S.2d 270, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10553 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered May 25, 1979, which denied their motion for summary judgment, granted defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint. [815]*815Order modified by adding to the third decretal paragraph thereof after the word "dismissed”, the following: "except that it is declared that the curriculum is the province of the school board and there was no violation of the plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights.” As so modified, order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to defendants. We agree with the reasoning of Special Term. However, since this was an action for a declaratory judgment, the complaint should not have been dismissed in its entirety (see Lanza v Wagner, 11 NY2d 317, app dsmd 371 US 74). Laser, J. P., Gibbons, Gulotta and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered May 25, 1979, which denied their motion for summary judgment, granted defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint. [815]*815Order modified by adding to the third decretal paragraph thereof after the word "dismissed”, the following: "except that it is declared that the curriculum is the province of the school board and there was no violation of the plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights.” As so modified, order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to defendants. We agree with the reasoning of Special Term. However, since this was an action for a declaratory judgment, the complaint should not have been dismissed in its entirety (see Lanza v Wagner, 11 NY2d 317, app dsmd 371 US 74). Laser, J. P., Gibbons, Gulotta and Margett, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 A.D.2d 814, 425 N.Y.S.2d 270, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deer-park-teachers-assn-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack