DEEP SOUTH VEGETABLES INC v. BENSON HILL HOLDINGS INC

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia
DecidedAugust 2, 2023
Docket7:23-cv-00069
StatusUnknown

This text of DEEP SOUTH VEGETABLES INC v. BENSON HILL HOLDINGS INC (DEEP SOUTH VEGETABLES INC v. BENSON HILL HOLDINGS INC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DEEP SOUTH VEGETABLES INC v. BENSON HILL HOLDINGS INC, (M.D. Ga. 2023).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION ) DEEP SOUTH VEGETABLES, INC., ) Case No, 7:23-cv-00069-WLS ) Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, ) ) v. ) ) J & J PRODUCE, INC. ) ) Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff.) oe) STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER SUBSTITUTING DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF Pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 25(c), PLAINTIFF/COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANT DEEP SOUTH VEGETABLES, INC. (“DSV”), DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF J&J PRODUCE, INC, (“J&J”), and prospective DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF BENSON HILL Ho.pines, INc. (“BHH”) hereby stipulate to the substitution of BHH as Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff in this matter, showing the Court as follows: 1, On April 20, 2023, DSV filed its Complaint against J&J in the Superior Court of Clinch County, Georgia. 2. On May 10, 2023, J&J was served with the Summons and Complaint. 3. On June 6, 2023, J&J filed a Notice of Removal in this Court, [Doc. 1.] . 4 On June 23, 2023, J&J timely filed its Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims

[Doc. 9] pursuant to the stipulation entered into with DSV. [Doe. 4.] 5. Prior to the June 30, 2023 closing of the transaction contemplated by the Stock Purchase Agreement (which agreement is described in Paragraph 6 below), BHH was a parent company of J&J, 6. On December 29, 2022, BHH and Benson Hill Fresh, LLC (the other parent company of J&J) entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement pursuant to which an unrelated third party agreed to purchase 100% of J&J’s equity securities from them, with closing of the Stock Purchase Agreement taking place on June 30, 2023. 7. Pursuant to the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, certain Retained Assets and Liabilities as defined therein were not included with the sale of J&J’s equity securities to the unrelated third party, but were assigned to BHH on June 30, 2023. A true and correct copy of the Assignment is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. Under the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, BHH also agreed to certain indemnity obligations. These Retained Assets and Liabilities that were assigned to BHH, and BHH’s indemnity obligations, include the alleged liabilities asserted by DSV against J&J in this action and the counterclaims asserted by J&J against DSV in the pleadings filed in this action. [See Assignment J 1 & 5.] 8, Fed.R.Civ.P, 25({c) provides, “[i]f an interest is transferred, the action may be continued by or against the original party unless the court, on motion, orders the transferee to be substituted in the action or joined with the original party.” “Rule 25(c) authorizes a substitution of parties after a transfer of interest has occurred.” Virgo v. Riviera Beach Assocs., 30 F.3d 1350, 1358 (11th Cir. -2-

1994), Fed.R.Civ.P. 25(c) applies to transfers of interest which occur after litigation is commenced, which is the case here. Andrews v. Lakeshore Rehab. Hosp., 140 F.3d 1405, 1407 (11th Cir. 1998). 9, Under the terms of the Assignment, BHH and J&J have agreed to pursue the necessary steps to substitute BHH for J&J in this litigation. [Assignment § 4.] 10. DSV, through its counsel, has consented to the substitution of BHH for J&J as both Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff in this action. 11. Under these circumstances, the service requirements under Fed.R.Civ.P, 25(c) are unnecessary and are waived by DSV, J&J, and BHH. 12. Accordingly, the parties request that BHH be substituted for J&J as Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff in this action and that the caption of this case be amended to read as follows: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION ) DEEP SOUTH VEGETABLES, INC., ) Case No, 7:23-cv-00069-WLS ) Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, )} ) Vv. ) ) BENSON HILL HOLDINGS, INC., } ) Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. ) a)

-3-

Respectfully submitted this 25" day of July, 2023. IT IS SO AGREED AND APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT: ELLIOTT BLACKBURN, PC COWART & PERRY, LLC James R. Miller fs/ Zachary R, Cowart James R, Miller Zachary R, Cowart Georgia Bar No. 159080 Georgia Bar No. 191980 3016 North Patterson Street 109 W. Adair Street Valdosta, Georgia 31602 Valdosta, Georgia 31601 (229) 242-3333 zcowarl@cowartandperry.com jmiller@elliottblackburn.com Attorney for Deep South Vegetables, Inc. Attorney for J&J Produce, Inc. & Benson Hill Holdings, Inc. MEUERS LAW FIRM, P.L. McCARRON & DIESS /s/Steven M, De Falco Steven M. De Falco (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) fs! Kate Ellis Florida Bar Number 0733571 Kate Ellis (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 5395 Park Central Court Washington, D.C. Bar No, 90007331 Naples, FL 34109 4530 Wisconsin Avenue N.W. (239) 513-9191 Suite 301 sdefalco@meuerslawfirm.com Washington, DC 20016 Attorney for Deep South Vegetables, Inc. (202) 364-0400 kellis@mecarronlaw.com Attorney for J&J Produce, Inc. & Benson Hill Holdings, Inc.

SO ORDERED, this of Ul MgnA , 2023. WL sacs W. LOUIS SANDS, IOR JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-4-

EXHIBIT | ASSIGNMENT jAttached]

June 30, 2023 IMG Fresh, LLC 7836 Cherry Lake Road Groveland, FL 34736 Attention: Melanie §. Ressler, President Email: melanie@imgcitrus.com

Re; Letter Agreement for Assigninent of Claims to Benson Hill Holdings, Ine. Dear Ms. Ressler: Reference is made to that certain Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”), dated as of December 29, 2022, by and among IMG Fresh, LLC, as a sticcessor in interest to Sweet Sixty, LLC (“Buyer”), Benson Hill Fresh, LLC (“Seller”}, and Benson Hill Holdings, Inc, (“Holdings*. Seller is the holder of record and beneficial owner of 100% of the issued and outstanding Equity Securities (the “Acquired Securities”) of J&J Produce, Inc. (“J&J"), a Florida corporation. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have such meanings ascribed to them in the Purchase Agreement. This letter will confirm our agreement that in connection with the Closing of the transactions contemplated under the Purchase Agreement, certain Retained Assets and Liabilities as defined therein are not included with the Acquired Companies as of Closing and are to be assigned to Holdings. These Retained Assets and Liabilities shatl include all Actions, known or unknown, brought by or against any of the Acquired Companies that arises from or in connection with the Claims described in Schedule A attached hereto (the “Transferred Claims”). 1. Seller, Holdings, J&J and Buyer agree that the Transferred Claims (a) are Retained Assets and Liabilities under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, and (b) are subject to the obligations of Seller and Holdings under Section 11,01 of the Purchase Agreement to indemnify Buyer Indemnified Parties for matters described therein, including but not limited to, Sections {1.01(g) and (h). Seller and Holdings represent and warrant to Buyer that as of the date hereof Section 5.04 of the Purchase Agreement is true and correct as of the date hereof other than those set forth on Schedule A attached hereto. 2, Seller, Holdings, J&J and Buyer agree that: 3. (a) until all Transferred Claims have been settled, dismissed, finally adjudicated or otherwise disposed of in a manner that results in absolutely no liability or potential for liability on the part of J&i or Buyer (the “Final Disposition”), the Escrow Amount shall not be released to Seller.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Andrews v. Lakeshore Rehabilitation Hospital
140 F.3d 1405 (Eleventh Circuit, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
DEEP SOUTH VEGETABLES INC v. BENSON HILL HOLDINGS INC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deep-south-vegetables-inc-v-benson-hill-holdings-inc-gamd-2023.