DEEP SEA ATLANTIC, N v. v. MICAL SEAFOOD, INC.
This text of DEEP SEA ATLANTIC, N v. v. MICAL SEAFOOD, INC. (DEEP SEA ATLANTIC, N v. v. MICAL SEAFOOD, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DEEP SEA ATLANTIC N.V., a Suriname Naamloze Vennootschap, Appellant,
v.
MICAL SEAFOOD, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.
No. 4D18-1603
[March 6, 2019]
Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Martin J. Bidwill, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 16-017578 (05).
Daniel Lustig, Michael J. Pike and Dominique J. Torsiello of Pike & Lustig, LLP, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
William G. Salim, Jr. and Ari J. Glazer of Moskowitz, Mandell, Salim & Simowitz, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We dismiss that portion of this appeal challenging an order denying dismissal under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.070(j). We do not have jurisdiction of orders denying dismissal under this rule, as such orders are not orders determining “jurisdiction of the person.” Jennings v. Montenegro, 792 So. 2d 1258, 1261 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). We affirm on all other issues as appellant did not overcome the presumption that arises from a return of service that is regular on its face. See Koster v. Sullivan, 103 So. 3d 882, 884 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012).
WARNER, GROSS and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
DEEP SEA ATLANTIC, N v. v. MICAL SEAFOOD, INC., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deep-sea-atlantic-n-v-v-mical-seafood-inc-fladistctapp-2019.