Deep Sea Atl. N.V. v. Mical Seafood, Inc.

264 So. 3d 1003
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 6, 2019
DocketNo. 4D18-1603
StatusPublished

This text of 264 So. 3d 1003 (Deep Sea Atl. N.V. v. Mical Seafood, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Deep Sea Atl. N.V. v. Mical Seafood, Inc., 264 So. 3d 1003 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We dismiss that portion of this appeal challenging an order denying dismissal under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.070(j). We do not have jurisdiction of orders denying dismissal under this rule, as such orders are not orders determining "jurisdiction of the person." Jennings v. Montenegro , 792 So.2d 1258, 1261 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). We affirm on all other issues as appellant did not overcome the presumption that arises from a return of service that is regular on its face. See Koster v. Sullivan , 103 So.3d 882, 884 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012).

Warner, Gross and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jennings v. Montenegro
792 So. 2d 1258 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Koster v. Sullivan
103 So. 3d 882 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
264 So. 3d 1003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deep-sea-atl-nv-v-mical-seafood-inc-fladistctapp-2019.