Deep Rock Oil Corp. v. Howell

1948 OK 173, 204 P.2d 282, 200 Okla. 675, 1948 Okla. LEXIS 547
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedJuly 13, 1948
DocketNo. 32514
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 1948 OK 173 (Deep Rock Oil Corp. v. Howell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Deep Rock Oil Corp. v. Howell, 1948 OK 173, 204 P.2d 282, 200 Okla. 675, 1948 Okla. LEXIS 547 (Okla. 1948).

Opinion

GIBSON, J.

This is an original proceeding for a writ prohibiting respond[676]*676ent from further exercising jurisdiction in cause No. 24179, pending in the district court of Seminole county, wherein one Charles L. Vannoy is plaintiff and the petitioners herein are defendants.

It is recognized by the parties to this proceeding, and it so appears to the court, that the sole question for determination is the jurisdiction of the district court to entertain a common law action for damages by an employee of an independent contractor who has complete insurance coverage, as required by the Workmen’s Compensation Act, against the principal contractor where such employee received an accidental injury in the course of his employment by reason of the negligence of the principal contractor. It is also recognized that the same issue was the major question involved in cause No. 32328, styled Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. Wilkerson, 200 Okla. 335, 193 P. 2d 586, and at the instance of respondents the determination of this proceeding was held in abeyance pending the determination in cause No. 32328. And it now appearing that the decision therein is determinative of the question presented here, we are of the opinion that the writ should be granted. We adopt as the law of this case the first and second paragraphs of the syllabus in Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. Wilkerson, supra.

Writ granted.

HURST, C.J., DAVISON, V.C.J., and WELCH, ARNOLD, and LUTTRELL JJ., concur. CORN, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Green v. Cherokee Pipe Line Co.
261 F. Supp. 118 (N.D. Oklahoma, 1966)
Creighton v. District Court of Seminole County
1961 OK 11 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1961)
Lee Evans Oil & Gas Co. v. Superior Court of Seminole County
1959 OK 99 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1959)
Trotter v. Ozarks Rural Electric Coop. Corporation
294 S.W.2d 498 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1956)
Woody v. Union Equity Co-Operative Exchange
146 F. Supp. 217 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1954)
Horwitz Iron & Metal Co. v. Myler
1952 OK 460 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1952)
Londagin v. McDuff
251 P.2d 496 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1952)
Harper v. Stroud
108 F. Supp. 436 (W.D. Arkansas, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1948 OK 173, 204 P.2d 282, 200 Okla. 675, 1948 Okla. LEXIS 547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deep-rock-oil-corp-v-howell-okla-1948.