Deel v. State
This text of 508 So. 2d 527 (Deel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
After his prior conviction was reversed1 the appellant pled nolo contendere and was resentenced. The sole contention on this appeal is that the trial court erred in failing to give proper credit for time served pursuant to § 921.161(1), Florida Statutes. This issue should be first raised in the trial court by motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 for the reasons explained in Meintzer v. State, 399 So.2d 133 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). See also Everett v. State, 492 So.2d 861 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Spurlock v. State, 449 So.2d 973 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), rev. denied, 466 So.2d 212 (Fla.1985); Jensen v. State, 449 So.2d 969 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).2 The trial court’s judgment and sentence are affirmed without prejudice to the defendant seeking credit for time served by 3.850 motion.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
508 So. 2d 527, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1454, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deel-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.