Deegan v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Deegan v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

31 Misc. 743, 64 N.Y.S. 12

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 31 Misc. 743 (Deegan v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Deegan v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co., 31 Misc. 743, 64 N.Y.S. 12 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Giegebich, J.

The only questions involved upon this appeal arise from a determination of the facts, as to which there was a [744]*744conflict of testimony. The finding of the justice in favor of the defendant is warranted by the evidence, and we see no reason for disturbing such determination in the absence of the elements which are requisite to a review of the facts. Lynes v. Hickey, 4 Misc. Rep. 522.

As we are unable to discover any ground for disturbing the judgment, it should be affirmed, with costs.

Beekman, P. J., and O’Gorman, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI