Deedrick v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Deedrick v. State

93 So. 3d 513, 2012 WL 3044256, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12220

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 27, 2012

DocketNo. 5D11-649

StatusPublished

This text of 93 So. 3d 513 (Deedrick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Deedrick v. State, 93 So. 3d 513, 2012 WL 3044256, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12220 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Harold Mitchell Deedrick appeals from the judgment and sentence entered after a jury found him guilty of battery and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. We affirm Deedrick’s convictions without discussion. However, we remand for correction of a scrivener’s error in the judgment reflecting a guilty plea to the charges. The judgment should reflect a finding of guilty following a trial by jury.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s error.

TORPY, LAWSON and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Harold Mitchell Deedrick appeals from the judgment and sentence entered after a jury found him guilty of battery and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. We affirm Deedrick’s convictions without discussion. However, we remand for correction of a scrivener’s error in the judgment reflecting a guilty plea to the charges. The judgment should reflect a finding of guilty following a trial by jury.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s error.

TORPY, LAWSON and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 So. 3d 513, 2012 WL 3044256, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deedrick-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.