Deeb v. Cushwa

Indiana Court of Appeals

Deeb v. Cushwa

144 N.E. 926, 81 Ind. App. 572, 1924 Ind. App. LEXIS 85

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 25, 1924

DocketNo. 11,812

StatusPublished

This text of 144 N.E. 926 (Deeb v. Cushwa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Deeb v. Cushwa, 144 N.E. 926, 81 Ind. App. 572, 1924 Ind. App. LEXIS 85 (Ind. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The only alleged error which the appellant has attempted to present on this appeal was the overruling of his motion for a new trial, and the only matter which he attempts to present under such assignment was the giving of certain instructions.

The appellee has moved to “dismiss the appeal” for the reason “that the transcript is in such condition that no question is presented for our consideration.”

The appeal in this case appears to have been duly taken, and this court has jurisdiction of the parties and of the subject-matter. We know of no rule of this [573]*573court, nor of any statute which would authorize us, under these circumstances, to dismiss this appeal.

However, an examination of the transcript of the record herein discloses that no exception was taken by the appellant to the giving of any of the instructions of .which he now attempts to complain. The record presents no question for our consideration. It being in this condition, the judgment of the trial court must be and is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The only alleged error which the appellant has attempted to present on this appeal was the overruling of his motion for a new trial, and the only matter which he attempts to present under such assignment was the giving of certain instructions.

The appellee has moved to “dismiss the appeal” for the reason “that the transcript is in such condition that no question is presented for our consideration.”

The appeal in this case appears to have been duly taken, and this court has jurisdiction of the parties and of the subject-matter. We know of no rule of this [573]*573court, nor of any statute which would authorize us, under these circumstances, to dismiss this appeal.

However, an examination of the transcript of the record herein discloses that no exception was taken by the appellant to the giving of any of the instructions of .which he now attempts to complain. The record presents no question for our consideration. It being in this condition, the judgment of the trial court must be and is hereby affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 N.E. 926, 81 Ind. App. 572, 1924 Ind. App. LEXIS 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deeb-v-cushwa-indctapp-1924.