Dee Jay Holding Corp. v. Fleming
Opinion
Order denying defendants’ motion to consolidate actions reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Although the remedies sought by plaintiff are concurrent, and each action properly brought, the facts involved in the two eases are identical. Concededly, [784]*784action No. 1 will be reached for trial at the June term in Queens county, at which time the entire controversy may be adjudicated, and substantial rights will not be prejudiced by consolidation. (Levy v. Portugal, 217 App. Div. 776.) Kelly, P. J., Manning,. Kapper, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
220 A.D. 783 (Dee Jay Holding Corp. v. Fleming) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.