Dee Farmer v. Edward Brennan, Dennis Kurzydlo, Larry E. Dubois

28 F.3d 1216, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 25041, 1994 WL 329399
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dee Farmer v. Edward Brennan, Dennis Kurzydlo, Larry E. Dubois. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 F.3d 668
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided July 8, 1994·No. 92-1772·Unpublished

Opinion

28 F.3d 1216

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpublished orders shall not be cited or used as precedent except to support a claim of res judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case in any federal court within the circuit.
Dee FARMER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Edward BRENNAN, Dennis Kurzydlo, Larry E. Dubois, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-1772.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

July 8, 1994.

Before COFFEY, FLAUM and RIPPLE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

On March 23, 1992, the district court entered summary judgment in favor of the defendants on plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim. Relying on existing precedent, see McGill v. Duckworth, 944 F.2d 344 (7th Cir.1991), we summarily affirmed the district court's judgment. On June 6, 1994, the Supreme Court vacated our judgment and remanded the case to this Court. Farmer v. Brennan, No. 92-7247 (U.S. June 6, 1994). In light of that decision, it is ordered that the judgment of the district court is VACATED and this case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dee Farmer v. Edward Brennan, Dennis Kurzydlo, Larry E. Dubois, 28 F.3d 1216, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 25041, 1994 WL 329399 (7th Cir. 1994).

28 F.3d 1216 (Dee Farmer v. Edward Brennan, Dennis Kurzydlo, Larry E. Dubois) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related