Dedo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dedo v. State

569 So. 2d 1388, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8977, 1990 WL 181848

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 28, 1990

DocketNo. 90-0830

StatusPublished

This text of 569 So. 2d 1388 (Dedo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dedo v. State, 569 So. 2d 1388, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8977, 1990 WL 181848 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises two points, neither of which we conclude to have merit, but one of which warrants discussion.

We hold that appellant waived his right to a determination of his ability to pay the restitution subsequently ordered by the trial court by failing to preserve same when entering his plea. The only issue which was preserved and remained for the trial court was the amount of restitution.

ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and OFTEDAL, RICHARD L., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises two points, neither of which we conclude to have merit, but one of which warrants discussion.

We hold that appellant waived his right to a determination of his ability to pay the restitution subsequently ordered by the trial court by failing to preserve same when entering his plea. The only issue which was preserved and remained for the trial court was the amount of restitution.

ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and OFTEDAL, RICHARD L., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

569 So. 2d 1388, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8977, 1990 WL 181848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dedo-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.