Dedman v. Albina Fuel Co.
829 P.2d 716, 112 Or. App. 632, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 776
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided April 22, 1992·No. 9007-04187; CA A69329·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Plaintiff assigns error to the granting of defendant’s motion for judgment n.o.v., one of the grounds for which was that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict. The focus of plaintiffs argument on appeal is that there was supporting evidence. Plaintiffs designation of record does not include any part of the trial testimony or other evidence, except for selected exhibits. The record before us is not sufficient for us to review the assignment. Universal Ideas Corp. v. Esty, 84 Or App 541, 734 P2d 408 (1987).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dedman v. Albina Fuel Co., 829 P.2d 716, 112 Or. App. 632, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 776 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).
829 P.2d 716 (Dedman v. Albina Fuel Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Friedman v. Christy
973 P.2d 378 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1999)