Dedhia v. Malek

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dedhia v. Malek

909 So. 2d 490, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 13391, 2005 WL 2043523

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 26, 2005·No. No. 5D05-1190·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We deny the petition for writ of certio-rari. The trial court has made no ruling regarding the admissibility at trial of the settlement agreements reached among the petitioners/defendants, Maya Dedhia and Seema Dedhia, and others who are no longer parties to the action below. Consequently, no departure from the essential requirements of law has been demonstrated.

[491]*491PETITION FOR CERTIORARI DENIED.

THOMPSON, SAWAYA and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We deny the petition for writ of certio-rari. The trial court has made no ruling regarding the admissibility at trial of the settlement agreements reached among the petitioners/defendants, Maya Dedhia and Seema Dedhia, and others who are no longer parties to the action below. Consequently, no departure from the essential requirements of law has been demonstrated.

[491]*491PETITION FOR CERTIORARI DENIED.

THOMPSON, SAWAYA and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Dedhia v. Malek, 909 So. 2d 490, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 13391, 2005 WL 2043523 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

909 So. 2d 490 (Dedhia v. Malek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.