Dedge v. State

103 S.E. 724, 25 Ga. App. 547, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 68
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 28, 1920
Docket11631
StatusPublished

This text of 103 S.E. 724 (Dedge v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dedge v. State, 103 S.E. 724, 25 Ga. App. 547, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 68 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The special grounds of the motion for a new trial, complaining of alleged errors of omission in the charge of the court, are without merit. In the absence of timely and appropriate written requests for more particular instructions the charge was sufficiently full.

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 S.E. 724, 25 Ga. App. 547, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dedge-v-state-gactapp-1920.