Deders v. Wood

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Deders v. Wood

156 N.Y.S. 605

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJanuary 7, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 156 N.Y.S. 605 (Deders v. Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Deders v. Wood, 156 N.Y.S. 605 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

[1] Appellant contends that the record as transmitted to this court is not complete. When this case was previously [606]*606before this court (153 N. Y. Supp. 938), it was remitted to the lower court for the purpose of having the trial justice return whether or not, at tire time judgment was directed, the defendant had finished his testimony and rested his case. Return has now been made, namely, that defendant had finished his testimony and rested his case. The record seems still to be incomplete. The judgment roll, marked Plaintiff’s Exhibit I, is not attached to the record, and there is no stipulation in reference to the same.

[2] If, as appellant contends, the record is incomplete in this and other respects, his remedy is by motion before this court, on notice to plaintiff’s attorney, to have the record remitted to the lower court for the purpose of allowing defendant to move before the trial justice in the first instance for a resettlement of the case.

Case returned to files of this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

[1] Appellant contends that the record as transmitted to this court is not complete. When this case was previously [606]*606before this court (153 N. Y. Supp. 938), it was remitted to the lower court for the purpose of having the trial justice return whether or not, at tire time judgment was directed, the defendant had finished his testimony and rested his case. Return has now been made, namely, that defendant had finished his testimony and rested his case. The record seems still to be incomplete. The judgment roll, marked Plaintiff’s Exhibit I, is not attached to the record, and there is no stipulation in reference to the same.

[2] If, as appellant contends, the record is incomplete in this and other respects, his remedy is by motion before this court, on notice to plaintiff’s attorney, to have the record remitted to the lower court for the purpose of allowing defendant to move before the trial justice in the first instance for a resettlement of the case.

Case returned to files of this court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

156 N.Y.S. 605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deders-v-wood-nyappterm-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack