Dedeoglou v. Beckles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dedeoglou v. Beckles

84 A.D.2d 827, 449 N.Y.S.2d 442, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16052

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 30, 1981·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Harrington, J.), entered April 22, 1980, which granted the defendants’ motion, at the close of the plaintiff’s case, to dismiss the complaint. Judgment reversed'and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. Based on the record before the trial court, it was improper to grant defendants’ motion for a directed verdict. Plaintiff made out a prima facie case and the matter should therefore have gone to the jury. Mangano, J.P., O’Connor, Weinstein and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Harrington, J.), entered April 22, 1980, which granted the defendants’ motion, at the close of the plaintiff’s case, to dismiss the complaint. Judgment reversed'and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. Based on the record before the trial court, it was improper to grant defendants’ motion for a directed verdict. Plaintiff made out a prima facie case and the matter should therefore have gone to the jury. Mangano, J.P., O’Connor, Weinstein and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Dedeoglou v. Beckles, 84 A.D.2d 827, 449 N.Y.S.2d 442, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16052 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

84 A.D.2d 827 (Dedeoglou v. Beckles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related