Dedeaux v. Wing
This text of 256 A.D.2d 1216 (Dedeaux v. Wing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination, made after a fair hearing, to discontinue for six months the public assistance benefits received by petitioner. The benefits were discontinued based upon a determination that she willfully refused and failed without good cause to appear for a scheduled Job Opportunities and Basic Skills Training Program. That determination is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Poole v Wing, 256 AD2d 1217 [decided herewith]; Matter of Vicari v Wing, 244 AD2d 974; Matter of Perry v Wing, 242 AD2d 964; see generally, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180-181). Petitioner’s remaining contentions lack merit. (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga . County, Mordue, J.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Wisner, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
256 A.D.2d 1216, 682 N.Y.S.2d 364, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dedeaux-v-wing-nyappdiv-1998.