Deddo v. Volpe

Appellate Court of Illinois

Deddo v. Volpe

201 Ill. App. 529

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedOctober 18, 1916

DocketGen. No. 21,246

StatusPublished

This text of 201 Ill. App. 529 (Deddo v. Volpe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Deddo v. Volpe, 201 Ill. App. 529 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Goodwin

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 4*—when judge of another court may sit in Municipal Court. A judgment of the Municipal Court of Chicago held not illegal because it was entered by one not a judge of that court, where the placita showed the presiding judge to have been a “judge of the County Court of Lake County, Illinois, holding a branch of the Municipal Court of Chicago at the reguest of the judges of the said Municipal Court,” as such authority is expressly conferred by the Municipal Court Act, sec. 13 (J. & A. ¶ 3325). 4. Trial, § 45*—when prejudice and Mas not exhibited by trial judge. Record on appeal in an action for breach of contract, held not to sustain a contention that prejudice and bias were exhibited by the trial court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Goodwin

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 4*—when judge of another court may sit in Municipal Court. A judgment of the Municipal Court of Chicago held not illegal because it was entered by one not a judge of that court, where the placita showed the presiding judge to have been a “judge of the County Court of Lake County, Illinois, holding a branch of the Municipal Court of Chicago at the reguest of the judges of the said Municipal Court,” as such authority is expressly conferred by the Municipal Court Act, sec. 13 (J. & A. ¶ 3325). 4. Trial, § 45*—when prejudice and Mas not exhibited by trial judge. Record on appeal in an action for breach of contract, held not to sustain a contention that prejudice and bias were exhibited by the trial court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 Ill. App. 529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deddo-v-volpe-illappct-1916.