DeCosta v. Gossage
783 N.W.2d 386, 486 Mich. 1059
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in DeCosta v. Gossage. Read the opinion of the Court — 486 Mich. 116 →
Opinion
Donna B. DECOSTA, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
David D. GOSSAGE, D.O., and Gossage Ye Center, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the motion for rehearing is considered, and it is DENIED.
MARKMAN, J. (dissenting).
I would grant defendant's motion for rehearing and, on rehearing, I would vacate this Court's May 25, 2010 decision and affirm the Court of Appeals for the reasons set forth in my dissent. DeCosta v. Gossage, 486 Mich. 116, 782 N.W.2d 734 (2010).
CORRIGAN and YOUNG, JJ., join in the statement of MARKMAN, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
DeCosta v. Gossage, 783 N.W.2d 386, 486 Mich. 1059 (Mich. 2010).
783 N.W.2d 386 (DeCosta v. Gossage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
DeCosta v. Gossage
782 N.W.2d 734 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2010)