DeCoss v. Turner & Blanchard, Inc.
242 A.D. 785
Opinion
Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and defend[786] ant’s motion to dismiss the complaint granted on the ground that the plaintiff’s cause of action is barred by the judgment heretofore entered in favor of the defendant involving the same accident and alleged wrong, on the authority of Luce v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis R. R. Co. 213 App. Div. 374; affd., 242 N. T. 519) and Baltimore S. S. Co. v. Phillips (274 IT. S. 316). Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
DeCoss v. Turner & Blanchard, Inc., 242 A.D. 785 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).
242 A.D. 785 (DeCoss v. Turner & Blanchard, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Luce v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad
213 A.D. 374 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925)